The Insurers Who Cried 'Claims!'

Throughout 2020 a barrage of COVID-related claims seemed perpetually just round the corner, but ultimately remained conspicuously absent. Drawing from Berne Union data for 2020 and our 'business confidence' survey of industry sentiment, we look at how claims played out last year, and what we might expect in 2021
Jonathan Skovbro Steenberg
Jonathan Skovbro Steenberg
Economic Research Analyst, Berne Union
30/05/2021

The ‘Boy who Cried “Wolf”’ is an allegory from Aesop’s fables that many could have been forgiven for applying to the export credit and investment insurance industry in the first months after COVID-19 when insurers have continually predicted a huge bulk of claims around the corner that, for many, did not materialise.

Looking at Berne Union data, last year did in fact end up being a year of high claims paid – with the total rising around 20%. However, that 20% rise stems from claims paid relating to medium/long-term (MLT) export credit and included many claims not directly related to COVID-19 but paid in 2020 incidentally. Short-term (ST) export credit insurers meanwhile, and perhaps surprisingly, reported a slight fall in claims in 2020.

Nonetheless, unmaterialised short-term claims and seemingly unrelated medium/long-term claims mean export credit insurers still fear claims to come. With much debt rescheduled or extended, zombie companies kept alive by revised insolvency legislation and government support and high debt levels for governments and companies alike, insurers have good reason to keep crying claims.

What actually happened in 2020?

When export credit insurers were asked about emerging claims and potential loss notifications at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, they almost unanimously foresaw an increase and most were at that point already handling a high volume of requests for rescheduling or restructuring of debt.

Unlike previous crises, new business rose for export credit insurers in 2020 as risk perception soared among exporters, while ECAs were given wider mandates to support their economies. Equally, in contrast to previous crises, ST claims did not rise significantly and immediately, while MLT claims, usually less sensitive to business cycles and crises, increased substantially.

Figure 1 displays the development of claims paid by Berne Union members from 2017 to 2020 as well as the implied Claims Ratio*. While an overall increase is clear, the cause is perhaps surprising – it is entirely driven by MLT claims, which rose by 44% in 2020 compared to the preceding year, while ST claims were essentially unchanged. The claims ratio for MLT, which had been stable in the past few years, increased markedly from 0.44% to 0.66%; the highest level since 2009 following the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). ST claims, which more than doubled in 2009 following the GFC, remained unchanged in 2020.

Figure 1: Claims paid and Claims Ratio for Export credit insurers from 2017-2020

* Claims Paid in year T divided by Outstanding Commitments at the end of year T-1. The ST Claims Ratio is Claims Paid in year T divided by the average of end-year exposure of Year T and T-1 due to the shorter tenor of these commitments

With the objective to support businesses and households during the first and subsequent lockdowns, many governments, especially in developed economies, introduced furlough schemes, guaranteed loans and made favourable changes to business insolvency procedures which have ultimately kept people employed and halted corporate insolvencies throughout 2020. Corporate insolvencies and non-performing loans actually fell in many countries and regions across the world, explaining the absent rise in ST claims.

Similarly, while MLT claims have indeed shown a significant increase in 2020, the reasons behind this are nuanced, and not attributable purely to ‘COVID impact’. First of all, it should be noted that 2019 was a relatively low year for MLT claims paid, compared to the 5-year average; amplifying the apparent year on year increase through 2020. Secondly, a number of sizable MLT claims paid in 2020 relate to projects or transactions which were already problematic before COVID-19. Of course, some sectors directly affected by the pandemic, such as the airline industry, have seen claims increase in 2020, however not to the degree that one could expect, and other sectors are yet to see any rises in claims paid at all.

Distribution of claims paid

The export credit and investment insurance industry is a truly global one, covering trade and investment in all regions of the world, and despite the COVID-19 pandemic being equally global in scale, it has affected countries and regions differently. This is also reflected in the distribution of claims paid in 2020.

Latin America (LATAM) & Caribbean, Europe and North America were the three regions worst hit by COVID-19 in 2020 with all three regions reporting COVID-19 related death rates of over a 100 per 100,000 people. These three regions also saw the highest claims paid by export credit insurers in the last year (Figure 2) with more than $1.5 billion in LATAM & Caribbean and Europe. North America had claims paid of more than $1 billion in 2020. Every region, except for East Asia & Pacific (APAC) and the Middle East and North America (MENA), saw a higher volume of MLT claims than ST claims paid.

Figure 2: Claims paid by Export credit insurers in 2020 by region

in USD millions

Although the COVID-19 pandemic might appear to be the cause of high claims paid in LATAM & Caribbean, Figure 3 shows that claims ratios were also high in 2019. The MLT claims ratio was actually lower in 2020 than the previous year. LATAM & Caribbean has been dogged by economic and political turmoil in recent years and this continues to be the main driver of the high claims ratios. Europe – the largest destination for ST cover – shows much lower claims ratios, but a similar pattern, with the figure for MLT claims also dropping from 2019 – 2020. In contrast, North America did see a steep increase in the claims ratios for both ST and MLT, however a large share of these claims were related to projects transactions with pre-existing difficulties, exacerbated, but not caused by COVID-19.

Figure 3: Claim Ratio (%) by business line in 2019 and 2020 by region


Note: Green bar means a lower claims ratio in 2020 than in 2019, while a red bar indicates a higher claims ratio in 2020 than in 2019.

While 2020 was a better year than many insurers feared, it was still a year that generally saw claims ratios increase compared to 2019, as Figure 3 shows. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and MENA experienced an increase in the claims ratios for both ST and MLT with rising MLT claims paid across almost all sectors in SSA – a region that saw an exodus of foreign investment in 2020. A similar, although not as widespread, trend was seen in MENA where most sectors saw increases in claims paid.

Figure 4: Claims Paid & Ratio by Sector in 2020

in USD millions

The transportation sector was one of the hardest hit sectors in 2020 after borders were closed, flights were grounded, and business trips and holidays cancelled. It is no surprise that the sector experienced the highest volume of MLT claims paid in 2020 – over $1 billion – almost double the amount for the preceding year.

Export credit insurers exposed to the airline sector had a difficult year, despite being proactive and diligent with regards to processing requests for extensions and debt restructuring. The manufacturing sector equally had a tumultuous year in 2020 and it was the second largest sector for claims paid by insurers, in addition to having the highest claims ratio of specified sectors – see Figure 4.

MLT arrears (amounts overdue for payment) similarly increased in 2020: Up 7% in the first half of the year, followed by an additional increase in the latter half of 2020 and resulting in MLT arrears being 10% higher at end-2020 compared to end-2019.

Rising arrears is an indication that claims are still to come given that these arrears must either be paid late, materialise as claims or be rescheduled. Underwriters were faced with many requests for extensions of debt payments or debt rescheduling in 2020, including for both corporate and sovereign obligors and managed either bilaterally or through the Debt Service Sustainability Initiative (DSSI) initiated by the Paris Club, G20, World Bank and the IMF in early 2020 – a further indication that claims paid alone do not give a true impression of the risk situation.

Claims in the new decade

The first months of 2021 felt like a continuation of 2020 as lockdown measures were reintroduced, borders limited, and business had to continue operating in the world of restrictions and remote working. Export credit insurers also had to accept that the first quarter of 2021 was an extension of the status quo regarding emerging claims and claims paid.

While no crisis is the same, it is still interesting to learn from what happened during the last great crises. One interesting difference between the COVID-19 crisis and the GFC is that in 2008 public providers (ECAs and multilaterals) faced an immediate increase in ST claims as well as seeing claims materialise to a higher degree than their private counterparts.

The business of Public providers, especially with respect to ST credit, is markedly different than that of their private counterparts, focused on market gaps, including SMEs, riskier markets and other ‘non-marketable’ risks. SMEs generally have weaker balance sheets than large multinational corporations, meaning that they would need financing earlier during a crisis and have a more difficult time obtaining it which can result in a larger share of SMEs going bankrupt in the early stages of a crisis.

Figure 5: ST claims ratio by provider after crises

Index (H1 2008 = 100, H2 2019 = 100)

In the first half-year after the GFC, public providers were already seeing their ST claims ratios increasing by half, and after a year-and-a-half it had almost quadrupled. Meanwhile, the ST claims ratio of private insurers was roughly unchanged through 2008 but started increasing rapidly and almost tripled in the following year – as shown in the dotted lines in Figure 5.

The current crisis has shown very different dynamics (Figure 5 unbroken lines) as both private and public insurers saw a lower level of ST claim ratios in the latter half of 2020 compared to the pre-pandemic level in the latter half of 2019. Private insurers even saw a significant drop in the first half of 2020 when lockdowns were at their peak.

Private insurers’ expectation for ST claims in the first half of 2021 has been mixed. Initially they expected increasing claims paid in the first three months followed by a decrease in the second quarter of 2021 in anticipation of a rebounding economy and a prolongation of government. However, insurers now fear the bulk of bankruptcies will emerge in the second half of 2021 and 2022 once government support measures are phased out. Some private insurers note that they mainly have larger corporate clients who are better positioned to weather the storm and have had time to minimise their exposure to very vulnerable sectors, resulting in their current portfolios not being as sensitive to an eventual phase out. Some also expect the claims cycle has been elongated due to the support measures, suggesting that COVID-19 related claims may gradually emerge over several years going forward.

Public providers, on the other hand, had their mandates widened in 2020 to support businesses more broadly, including those industries most severely impacted by COVID-19. Being more exposed to these industries, SMEs and more vulnerable risks in general may be the reason why public providers continue to expect increasing ST claims in both quarters of the first half of 2021 as well as going forward. More and earlier claims paid by public providers will echo the trend seen after the GFC.

Figure 6: MLT claims ratio by provider after crises

Index (H1 2008 = 100, H2 2019 = 100)

MLT export credit has historically been less vulnerable to business cycles and often exhibits a lag before claims begin emerging following a crisis. During the GFC, the MLT claims ratio only started increasing drastically after a year-and-a-half, when it suddenly jumped to levels that were almost four times higher than pre-crisis levels.

However, the COVID-19 crisis once again proved different as public providers saw their MLT claims increase immediately and continue to rise in the latter half of 2020, resulting in an MLT claims ratio almost twice as high as the pre-pandemic level in last half of 2019. If – as seems to be the case – this initial increase in the MLT claims ratio for public providers does not relate primarily to COVID-19, then assuming a similar pattern of delay between cause and claims as during the GFC, then 2021 may well continue the prevailing trend of rapidly increasing MLT claims.

Private insurers, on the other hand, have not seen a significant materialisation of claims in 2020 and their MLT claims ratio was roughly unchanged – similar to what happened after the GFC.

Both private and public insurers continue to expect claims paid to increase in the first half of 2021, supported by the development of increasing MLT arrears seen throughout 2020, with several insurers mentioning that the airline industry continues to be distressed. Generally, export credit insurers are worried about an uneven recovery among different regions and countries which, together with an increase in debt levels, could result in claims paid in several countries as a knock-on impact of sovereign defaults and corporate bankruptcies.

Looking forward, an important question is what will happen with the large amounts of rescheduled and restructured debt?

Data collected for our rolling ‘business confidence index’ indicates that while emerging claims were generally falling in the beginning of 2021, the trend of requests to extend or reschedule debt has continued and underlines that some borrowers continue to struggle in 2021. Flexibility and careful management of this by both insurers and lenders should mean that only a small number of these situations will ultimately progress to claims, but at the same time we need to be cautious that we avoid kicking the can down the road indefinitely.

The DSSI has been extended and continues in 2021 and a Common Framework for Debt Treatments to facilitate timely and orderly debt treatment for DSSI-eligible countries already has three participants. Financial markets generally received the DSSI well, viewing it as a measure to manage liquidity, rather than solvency. A big question going forward is how long debt can be postponed or rescheduled and how the Common Framework, which is more focused on debt sustainability, will be received by financial markets.

More BUlletin Publications

Innovating to promote sustainability and financial resilience

03/10/2024

This October BUlletin explores how ECAs are incorporating ESG, climate, and sustainability considerations into their mandates. Topics include climate risk management models used in building resilient portfolios, the challenges of attracting renewable energy investments in Africa, innovative partnerships for sustainable projects, and support for ...

Shaping the future: Transformations in trade finance and risk management

15/07/2024

This July edition of the BUlletin presents diverse insights from the evolving edge of global finance and trade. Industry experts explore timely topics including the powerful synergy between factoring and credit insurance, the impact of Basel IV, and ECAs as drivers of global trade. SINOSURE’s digital transformation and its tailored measures for...

Charting a course forward

01/05/2024

Charting a course forward: Navigating AI, digitalisation, and economic support amidst unprecedented global change

This May edition of the BUlletin offers fresh insights on embracing and implementing digital strategies, adopting AI tools to enhance efficiency and security, supporting the Ukrainian economy by helping keep trade...

Celebrating 90 years of supporting trade and investment

26/02/2024

Celebrating 90 years of supporting trade and investment - 1934 - 2024

Reflecting on Berne Union’s origins and celebrating its achievements. What does the future hold?

 

Climate Working Group: The continuing momentum for change

19/09/2023

Climate Working Group: The continuing momentum for change

The Berne Union’s Climate Working Group is proving a helpful forum for sharing good practice. How is it progressing, and how can our industry continue to help with this initiative?

Claims: Controling Chaos, and Risk Versus Reality

29/06/2023

Controling Chaos, and Risk Versus Reality

In this edition we explore BU claims data and its relation to predicting risk since the pandemic, we also feature a broker's eye view of the state of the CPRI market, the bold restructuring of Denmark's investment and export financing with EIFO, how EDC is looking at ESG risks and ...

Landmark modernisation for OECD Arrangement

25/04/2023

Landmark modernisation for OECD Arrangement

A bold agreement for the Arrangement marks a positive development for our industry. Also featuring
digital access to export finance for China SMEs, challenging the 'China debt trap' narrative for Africa,
insolvency trends, analysing service ...

What's on the horizon for 2023?

28/02/2023

What's on the horizon for 2023?

The pick of key issues to look out for in 2023 – from macro trends, potentially choppy seas for smaller ECAs,  possibilities for using Islamic finance in the renewable energy transition, China’s reopening, a bumpy CPRI outlook, and reinsurance complexities. 

Authors look at...

Digitalisation as a business leadership imperative

25/11/2022

Digitalisation as a business leadership imperative

Technology-driven trade and client interaction are nothing new. But increasing investment in digitalisation of fundamental business processes and decision making is driving a new way of looking at trade finance and risk underwriting. Authors highlight successes and challen...

Mobilising Africa's Potential

06/09/2022

Mobilising Africa's Potential

Despite the challenges there are many positive opportunities emerging for Africa today

Curated by the BU Sub-Saharan Africa Working Group, authors for this special edition of the BUlletin explore areas of growth and the role of different sources of international finance tapping this

Ripples and After-effects

22/07/2022

Ripples and After-effects

exploring the multiple secondary impacts of both the pandemic and the war in Ukraine

from sovereign risk in Africa, to energy security, political violence and the private CPRI market

Shocks and Short Circuits: The Rewiring of Global Trade

07/04/2022

Shocks and short-circuits: The re-wiring of global trade

The bright shoots of economic growth are under threat once again
Assailed by commodity supply shocks and political instability exacerbated by the war in Ukraine
Contributors this month look at the complex impacts on trade and investment across developed and...

Diverging Risk

14/01/2022

Some predict that 2022 may finally bring us beyond the thrall of the COVID-19 pandemic

But the events of past two years have brought significant divergence of risk across economic and geographic boundaries

Authors this month look at how this is playing out in a range of cases

New Foundations

29/09/2021

If the global economy is truly on the road to recovery how can we build the surest path to sustainable growth in our new net-zero world?

New foundations in tech, data, and cooperative frameworks may help guide us into the next phase

Illuminating Climate

22/07/2021

Now widely recognised as an economic as well as environmental imperative
The momentum to tackle climate change is building
Changing perspectives, policy, products and processes across the export credit industry

In search of claims

30/04/2021

Where is the avalanche of claims and insolvencies expected to emerge from COVID-19?
The picture so far is uneven across geographies, sectors and business lines
And for the future? Well, it depends...

Cross-roads for Africa's recovery

21/04/2021

The economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Africa has been considerable and the path of recovery depends on maintaining the support of local, regional and international stakeholders. But which approaches can best build upon the opportunities presented by growing intra-regional trade, and investment in sustainable infrastructure?

Navigating the Brave New World of Trade

23/03/2021

With the wounds of the pandemic still under triage, a rebound in trade could the best hope for governments and businesses alike.
But trade is under immense pressure from myriad directions.
How can we maintain supply of finance, in the face of growing demand and irregular patterns of risk?